Jesus gave to Peter the keys of the kingdom (Matthew 16:19). On the day of Pentecost he began to use them
to unlock doors.
But Peter said two things that might be
taken as contradictory. First, in order
to explain the supernatural phenomenon that occurred he quoted Joel, predicting
the Last Days and ending with a simple invitation, “’And it shall come to pass
that everyone who calls upon the name of the Lord shall be saved.’” (Acts 2:21
ESV)
But second, when the Spirit convicted the people of their
sins they cried out, “What shall we do?”
“And Peter said to them, ‘Repent and be baptized every one
of you in the name of Jesus Christ for the forgiveness of your sins, and you
will receive the gift of the Holy Spirit.’” (Acts 2:38 ESV)
Is there one key or are there more?
In the history of the Church there has been confusion over
what God requires for salvation. Some
say there are no “works” at all but that God chooses the ones who might be saved
and moves upon them to that end by an irresistible grace. Others sing, “Only believe, only believe, all
things are possible, only believe.” Some
Churches have developed relatively elaborate systems of doctrine, morals, ritual, spirituality, and ecclesiastical government to fulfill every jot and
tittle of the law. So today,
Christianity is divided between factions over how salvation is
accomplished. These are honest disagreements
because Scripture is not self-explanatory.
Various groups have proof texts for the position that they hold.
However, we cannot all be correct. If the Spirit inspired the sacred writings
then passages do not conflict with each other and apparent discrepancies point
to a lack of understanding on the part of us fallible human beings. But why should we care?
John Ankerberg once famously said, “If one tries to be saved in a way that one cannot be saved then one will not be saved.” Of course, by saying that Ankerberg
melodramatically raised the stakes so that folk might take his perspective more
seriously. But according to Romans
2:12-16, God will judge us justly according to the truth that we have.
Be that as it may, what if sincere Christians want a better
grasp of the keys? What if Christian teachers want to be more accurate in explaining the word? What if we desire to
attain to the unity of the faith and knowledge of the Son of God? What if God’s power is unlocked by a better
understanding of his purpose?
Assuming
those positive motivations, I would like to put forth this theory: the simpler formulas summarize and include
the more complex ones; otherwise, one makes hundreds of Biblical verses
optional and the temptation to sin might prevent the needed “obedience of the faith”
that saves (Romans 1:5 and 16:26). Therefore,
we should reject de minimis gospels and rather observe all that the Lord has commanded us.
No comments:
Post a Comment