c) 2012' name='copyright'/>Michael DeShane Hinton

Tuesday, April 9, 2013

The Essence of Spirituality


The essence of spirituality is to be like God.
Jesus said that God is spirit and, speaking of the resurrection, Paul wrote that Jesus became a life-giving spirit.  Similarly, Paul wrote that we no longer know Christ according to the flesh, acknowledging that he did come in the flesh but is no longer experienced that way.  Combating the Gnostic heresy John wrote that Jesus came in the flesh, though John is dualistic, the one who recorded the Lord’s words about God being spirit and we must be born again in the Spirit.
Many years ago a church official accused me of being an idolater for worshiping Jesus as God, co-equal with the Father and the Spirit in Trinitarian faith.  Fearing the same sin of idolatry Wolfhart Pannenberg, in JESUS, GOD AND MAN, stated that nowhere in Scripture is the Holy Spirit portrayed as a physical being.  Of course, Luke and others wrote that the Spirit came in the form of a dove.
But it is not idolatry to worship one that was briefly a man and then became a spiritual body that defies the laws of physics, though he still interacts with them via miracles.  It is not idolatry to worship the Spirit with the Father and Son, if the Spirit only briefly appeared for our sakes to anoint Jesus for ministry.
My point is that flesh, physicality, this material world is transitory.  Its form is passing away and our bodies will soon enough lie moldering in the grave.  Being God, it was not natural for Jesus to come in the form of sinful flesh.  We see in the Gospels his irritation with it and his desire to return to the Father.  He wanted the disciples to be glad that he was going home.  He promised that we would join him if we endured to the end.  If we are faithful he will raise us up to receive our spiritual bodies, too!
Hallelujah!
Since the carnal existence that we now share is transitory we must see this life as preparation for the next, becoming as much like God as possible now, at least to begin the process.
We are already spiritual beings, made in the image and likeness of God.  But because of sin that image is marred and we can hardly see our true selves.  But we begin to see, become enlightened, when we begin to discount the flesh and value the spiritual aspect of our nature.
I recently counseled a 50+ year-old man that has struggled with alcohol since he was 14.  Now the ravages of time, compounded by pollutions both of mind and body, has left him deeply depressed, suicidal, and asking questions that needed to be answered long ago.
He asked me why he has suffered so much.  I told him it was to demonstrate body/soul dualism and how the soul is more important than the body.  He was taken aback.  He had never heard that before, though he has been to church and AA meetings too many to count.
See, the body can become wracked with pain.  It can drive a man crazy with pain.  There is pain of heart and mind, as well, because of its association with the body.  But spirit is not touched by pain because it is not physical and has no need.
The way, then, to become more like God, more spiritual, is to have less need.  God needs nothing.  If one can contemplate that and relate to it as a beginning point of prayerful meditation then one can begin to develop a spiritual perspective.  Then the strength, peace, love, and joy of our freedom in Christ begins take root and will, in time, to bloom and grow, almost effortlessly, as the green grass springs forth and the flowers of the field open to the heavenly light.

Tuesday, March 5, 2013

Paul and James Reconciled


The biggest problem with the Church in America today is antinomianism, believing that works are not required for salvation.  Antinomianism takes both liberal and evangelical forms born of misunderstanding.

Confusion results from the apparent conflict between Paul and James in the New Testament:

For if Abraham was justified by works, he has something to boast about, but not before God. (Romans 4:2 ESV)
VS.
You see that a person is justified by works and not by faith alone.(James 2:24 ESV)
What is the explanation for these seemingly variant words?  How might these statements be reconciled?
The answer is quite simple.  The men are employing two different frames of reference.  Paul is thinking polemically, arguing against the circumcision party and Judaizing teachers that harassed him and his new converts among the Gentiles.  He uses Abraham as the exemplar for a class of people, the new Gentile Christians for whom he is the apostle and chief spokesman, justifying their access to covenant grace in terms of the big picture of God’s unfolding purpose in salvation history:
[Abraham] received the sign of circumcision as a seal of the righteousness that he had by faith while he was still uncircumcised. The purpose was to make him the father of all who believe without being circumcised, so that righteousness would be counted to them as well, (Romans 4:11 ESV)
Note the plural “to them” in Romans 4:11 just above.  Paul’s statements about justification by faith and not by works have a narrow and specific meaning within Paul’s polemical argument: Christianity, which includes believing Gentiles, supersedes Judaism as the new way of righteousness from God.
James uses the singular “a man” because he speaks to personal salvation.  James uses Abraham as the model and example of an individual whose saving faith must be completed by works.  His conclusion is clear: no works means a faith that cannot save.  The works required are found in the New Testament.  To believe in Jesus means to adopt his religion and obey his commands.  Therefore, one must be careful to do everything the New Testament says in order to be saved, all else being equal.

 

Wednesday, February 20, 2013

Greek Philosophical Suppositions of the New Testament (Rough Draft)


In fulfillment of prophecy (Daniel 8:21, 10:20, 11:2, Zechariah 9:13, and I Maccabees 1:1-7) and for hundreds of years before Christ the Jewish people were Hellenized, that is, profoundly influenced by the Greek language and culture. Hellenization was resisted by some but Jesus likely spoke Greek, quoted the Greek Old Testament, known as the Septuagint (LXX), and the New Testament was written in Greek.  In John’s Gospel it says several times that Jesus escaped threats to his life because it was not time for him to die.  But when Greeks wanted to see him he exclaimed, “Now is the Son of Man glorified,” and spoke of his death as the planting of a seed that would produce much fruit (John 12:24).

The ancient Greeks are known for Philosophy, that is, the love of wisdom.  Philosophy arose about 500 years before Christ; it criticized the polytheistic and mystery religions of the ancient world, putting forth belief in one virtuous God, and the laws that proceeded from his rational mind (Romans 1:20).  When Alexander the Great encountered the Jews in 331 BC he discovered that he and the High Priest in Jerusalem had dreams about each other (Josephus, ANTIQUITIES, xi. 8, §§ 4-6), so Alexander worshiped the God of the Jews and offered sacrifice in the temple.  He allowed the Jews to live in peace, following their own laws.  Many Jews then began to study Philosophy and saw that it was compatible with Judaism.  When Jesus and Paul were boys, for instance, Hillel ran two rabbinical schools in Jerusalem, with about 500 students each, one devoted to traditional Jewish interpretation of the Law, the other devoted to a philosophical exposition of the same .  From a reading both of Philosophy and the New Testament it is obvious that Jesus and the apostles adopted and adapted Greek rational categories and moral theory, making Christianity a philosophical religion, able to transmit the truth of God to a world-wide audience, again in fulfillment of Biblical prophecy (Daniel 7:13-14, and Revelation 5:9 and 7:9).  This was in accordance with God’s plan for the fullness of time (Acts 17:30, Galatians 4:4, Ephesians 1:10, and 2:11-12).

The advantage of a philosophical religion is that it transcends the parochial boundaries of Judaism with its cultic practices confined to the temple in Jerusalem and reliance on ethnic descent.  Jesus spoke, for instance, of God being able to raise up children of Abraham from rocks on the ground (Matthew 3:9) and of his body as the Temple (John 2:19-22).  Jesus is for Christians both High Priest and Sacrifice (Hebrews 6:20 and 10:1-22), following a philosophical method of conserving moral substance in various forms.  Jesus spoke of the kingdom of God/heaven rather than the kingdom of David/Israel (Acts 2:22-32 and Galatians 6:16).  Paul, Apostle to the Gentiles (non-Jewish people), warned us not to heed “Jewish myths and the commandments of men that reject the truth” (Titus 1:14).  He said the Law was abolished (Ephesians 2:15).  Hebrews says the Law is obsolete (8:13) and set aside because it is weak and ineffectual (7:18).  This represents the ascendancy of Philosophy within Christianity, and Christianity superseding Judaism as the only true religion.

However, we must deal honestly with an objection found in Colossians 2:8, a warning against “philosophy and empty deceit.”  That verse has three qualifying clauses, “according to human tradition, according to the elemental spirits of the universe, and not according to Christ” (cf. Galatians 4:8-9).  I assert that there is a philosophy that is “according to Christ,” and thus, holy tradition and used by the Holy Spirit.  We see it in the words of Jesus and the apostles.  What Paul specifically criticized was bad philosophy, the “debaters of this age” (I Corinthians 1:20), like Carneades, a Skeptic, who famously argued both sides of an issue on consecutive days in Rome.  In the New Testament the sophist and debater are excoriated along with the scribe and Pharisee, because by the time of Christ both Judaism and Philosophy had fallen into error and disrepair.  Our goal is to put forth Christian philosophy that is legitimately seen in the New Testament, sanctified by Jesus, who revived and perfected knowledge and vital piety in his day.

Greek philosophers believed in cosmological/philosophical dualism and its moral counterpart, the natural law: one ought to reject evil, seek and do the good (see Romans 12:9b); these form the suppositional basis of Christian theological orthodoxy.  In the chart below are described the classical categories of good and evil used in the New Testament.  For example, Paul spoke of carnal and spiritual being at war with each other (Galatians 5:17).  Likewise, the mature Christian is ready for spiritual meat because he has trained his faculties to distinguish between good and evil (Hebrews 5:14).  Good and evil are the stems from which all other concepts sprout.

So I present the chart below.  Each good above the line, which we should seek, has a corresponding opposite in what is evil below, that which we should avoid.  These concepts are easy to understand, if we will, because Western society is built upon them.  But remember, the supposition is not the conclusion.  God was incarnate in the person of his Son, Jesus Christ, to redeem us from the curse of our below the line existence, raising us up in him.  Christianity, therefore, represents a modified or mitigated dualism because it foresees an ultimate triumph of good over evil (I Corinthians 15), which begins now (II Corinthians 5:19, Colossians 1:20, and Hebrews 6:1-6) and will be concluded at some point in the future (Matthew 24:14).


References are from the Revised Standard Version unless otherwise noted.

+24 God (the ONE, Creator (Father and first cause)):  Deuteronomy 6:4-5, Malachi 2:10 & 15, I Corinthians 8:6, Ephesians 4:6, and I Timothy 2:5
+23 Jesus Christ, God’s Son, the Risen Lord:  Matthew 28:6/Mark 16:6 and Acts 1:9, Philippians 2:7-11, Ephesians 1:20, and Hebrews 9:15 & 12:24,
+22 Perfection, TELEOS, (end, finished, intended goal):  Matthew 5:48, I Corinthians 13:10, Colossians 3:14, Hebrews 2:10 & 10:1, I John 2:5 & 4:17-18
+21 Existence, Being, or Consciousness; I AM (Supreme Being):  Exodus 3:13-14 and John 8:58; Colossians 1:16 & Revelation 4:11
+20 Life, Eternal Life:  Luke 6:9, John 1:4, 3:16, 5:21 & 24, 6:1-71, 10:10, Acts 3:15, Romans 2:6-7, II Timothy 1:10, Jude 1:21, I John 3:14, and Rev. 2:7
+19 Truth:  Luke 1:1-4, John 1:14 & 17, 4:23-24, 8:32, 14:6, 16:13, 18:37-38, Romans 1:18 & 25, 2:8, II Cor. 4:2, Ephesians 4:15, 21 & 25, and I Tim. 3:15
+18 Freedom:  John 8:32 & 36, Acts 13:39, Romans 6:7, 18, 20, 22-23, 8:2 & 21, II Corinthians 3:17, Galatians 2:4, 4:26 & 31, 5:1 & 13, I Peter 2:16
+17 Angelic, Angels, the Heavenly Host:  Matthew 1:20, 4:11, 13:39, Luke 1:26 ff., John 1:51, Acts 6:15, Hebrews 1:4-13, Jude 1:9, and Revelation 8:2
+16 Reason (32x in the New Testament):  Matthew 25:2, Colossians 2:18 and James 3:17 (Romans 12:1 KJV, logikos, “reasonable service,” & I Peter 2:2)
+15 Light, Enlightened (with Knowledge), Renewal of Mind:  Matthew 4:16, 10:27, John 8:12, Romans 12:1-3, 13:12, II Cor. 6:14,
Ephesians 4:18, 5:8-9, 13-14, I Thess 5:5, I Timothy 6:16, Hebrews 6:4, James 1:17, I John 1:5-7, 2:8-10, Revelation 21:23-24 and 22:5
+14 Law:  Matthew 5:17-18, 23:23, Romans 2:12-15, 3:31, 7:12, 14 & 16, 8:2-4, 7, 13:8 & 10, I Corinthians 9:20-21, Galatians 5:14, 18 & 23, and 6:2
+13 Faith:  II Corinthians 4:17-18, 5:7 and Hebrews 11
+12 Inner Man:  Luke 17:20-21 KJV, Romans 2:29 and 14:17, II Corinthians 4:16, and Ephesians 3:16
+11 LOGOS, “Word” of God (Divine Order/Purpose/Harmony in the Universe):  John 1:1 & 14, I Jn 1:1, and Rev 19:13; Lk 19:42, Jn 16:33 & Heb 12:11
+10 Permanent:  Matthew 19:16 & 29, 26:41, John 4:14 & 12:25, II Corinthians 3:11, 4:17-18, & 5:1, Galatians 6:8, Hebrews 6:17-18, 7:24, and I John 5:20
+9 Spirit/Soul, Spiritual:  (spirit 408x in NT, Holy Spirit 91x) Luke 1:35/Matthew 1:18, Matt. 10: 20 & 28, Mark 1:8/John 1:33, John 3:6, 4:24, 6:63, (8:15), 19:30, Rom 2:29, 8:3-13, 14: 17, I Cor 5:3-5, 15:44-46, II Cor 11:4, Gal 4:3 & 9, 5:13-6:8, Eph 3:16, 6:12, Phil 3:3, Col 2:11, and James 2:26
+8 Eternal forms of the good (Platonic):  John 6:27, (John 7:24), PHIL 2:6, Hebrews 10:1
+7 Energy (in the Greek energeia (8x in Paul) and dunamis (power, 119x in NT)):  Colossians 1:29 and Hebrews 1:3
+6 The Ideal:  (Matthew 19:10, and John 11:50 & 18:14), Revelation 21:22-23
+5 Abstract, Noumenal, Right:  John 2:21 (“justification by the Faith” is an abstraction for polemical purposes in Paul)
+4 Universal:  Daniel 7:13-14, Matthew 24:14, Acts 2:5-11, 11:1 & 18, Romans 3:29, and Revelation 5:9 &7:9
+3 Real, Substance (Plato’s Image, Paul’s IKON):  Romans 2:28-29, I Corinthians 8:4, Colossians 2:17, and Hebrews 8:5 & 10:1
+2 Things Above, From Above, Of Heaven:  (Heaven 231x in NT), Matt. 4:17 & 5:34, John 3:12, 31, 6:32, 8:23, I Cor. 15:47-49, Galatians 4:26,
Eph. 1:10, 4:6 & 9-10, Col. 1:20, 3:1-2, and Heb. 7:26, 9:23-24, and James 1:17, 3:15 & 17,
+1 Good:  Matthew 3:10, 7:11-19, 12:35, 19:16-17, John 5:29, 10:11, Romans 2:6-11, 7:19, 12:9 & 21, 15:14, II Cor. 5:10, Hebrews 5:14, and III Jn. 1:11

-1 Evil:  Matthew 7:11-19, 12:35, John 5:29, (10:11), Romans 2:6-11, 7:19, 12:9 & 21, II Corinthians 5:10, Hebrews 5:14, and III Jn. 1:11
-2 Things Below, Of Earth, Worldly:  Matt. 18:7, John 3:12, 31, 8:23, 18:36, I Cor. 1:26, 7:33, 15:47, II Cor. 1:12 & 17, 4:4, 5:1, 10:2-4, Eph. 1:10, 4:9-10, Phil. 3:19, Col. 1:20, 3:5, Titus 2:12, Heb. 9:1, James 3:15 & 4:4, II Peter 1:4, I John 2:15-17, and Jude 1:19
-3 Shadow:  Matthew 4:16/Luke 1:79, Colossians 2:17, Hebrews 8:5, 10:1, and James 1:17
-4 Particular:  I Timothy 1:4, and Titus 1:14
-5 Concrete, Phenomenal, Appearances:  John 2:21
-6 What’s Expedient:  Matthew 19:10, and John 11:50 & 18:14; Revelation 21:22-23
-7 Matter, the Elements/Elemental, Earthen Vessel:  II Corinthians 4:7, Galatians 4:3 & 9, Colossians 2:8 & 20, and II Peter 3:10 & 12
-8 Apparent forms (Aristotelian, formal cause), signs (77x in NT), appearances:  Matt 23:27-32, Mark 16:12, Luke 3:22, John 5:37, 6:26-27, 7:24, I Cor 7:31, Phil. 2:7-8, II Timothy 3:5, and (Hebrews 10:1), also Romans 8:28, 12:2, Galatians 4:19, and I Peter 1:14; Luke 1:4, Jude 1:5
-9 Body, Flesh, Carnal:  Matthew 10:28, 16:17, 26:41, Luke 12:4, John 3:6, 6:63, 8:15, Romans 6:6, 7:24 & 8:13, 7:5,14, 18, 25, 8:3-13, I Corinthians 5:3 & 9:27, 3:1-3, 5:5, 15:50 II Cor. 5:6 & 8, Galatians 5:18-6:8, Ephesians 6:12, Colossians 2:5, II Peter 1:13-14, and James 3:15
-10 Temporal, Passing Away:  Matthew 24:35/Mark 13:31, I Corinthians 7:31, II Corinthians 3:11, 4:17-18, 5:17, I John 2:8 & 17, and Revelation 21:1 & 4
-11 Chaos, Confusion, War:  I Corinthians 14:33; Romans 7:23, James 4:1-2, and I Peter 2:11
-12 Outward Situations and Circumstance:  II Corinthians 4:16 and Hebrews 11
-13 Sight:  Luke 17:20-21 KJV, “The kingdom of God cometh not with observation: Neither shall they say, Lo here! or, lo there! for, behold,
the kingdom of God is within you,” and II Corinthians 4:17-18 and 5:7
-14 Sin:  (“Sin is lawlessness.” (I John 3:4)), Acts 2:23, II Thessalonians 2:3, 7-9, II Peter 2:8 and 3:17
-15 Darkness (Ignorance):  Matthew 4:16, 10:27, Luke 6:23, John 1:5, 3:19, 8:12 & 12:46, Acts 26:18, Rom 13:12, II Cor. 6:14, Eph 4:18, and I John 1:5-7
-16 Passions (Desire, Emotion):  Romans 2:2, Colossians 2:18, Ephesians 4:17-24, Titus 3:3, James 4:1-3, I Peter 1:13-16, 2:11, 4:1-5, and II Peter 3:1-8
-17 Demonic, Hellish:  (Devil 35x and Demons 48x in NT) Matthew 13:39 & 23:15, I Timothy 4:1, James 3:15, and Revelation 16:14
-18 Slavery, Bondage, Oppression:  John 8:34-35, Romans 6:17, 8:15, I Corinthians 7:21-23, Galatians 2:4, 4:3, 26 & 31, 5:1, Titus 3:3, and II Peter 2:19
-19 Lies, Illusion and Delusion, False Witness:  Matthew 7:15, 26:59-60, John 8:44, Romans 1:25, II Corinthians 4:2, II Thess. 2:11, and Ephesians 4:25
-20 Death:  Matthew 4:16, John 5:24 & (8:51), Romans 6:10, 13, & 23, I Corinthians 15:21, 26, 54-56, II Cor. 3:7, II Timothy 1:10, and Revelation 21:4 & 8
-21 Nothingness, Utter Destruction:  I Corinthians 1:28, 13:2-3, Galatians 6:3, Hebrews 11:3, II Peter 2: 17, Jude v. 13, and Revelation 9:11
-22 The Imperfect, which passes away, childish, partial, and immature:  I Corinthians 13:8-11
-23 Satan, the Anti-Christ:  Mark 1:13, Luke 10:18 & 22:3, Acts 26:18, II Thessalonians 2:9, and Revelation 12:9
-24 Ultimate evil exists in multiplicities:  Mark 5:9&15 and Luke 8:30; (many) Matt 3:7, 6:7, 7:13 & 22, 24:11, Mk 15:3, Lk 10:41, I Jn 2:18, 4:1 and II Jn 1:7

Friday, February 8, 2013

The Faith vs. Works Principle in Paul


There is no doubt that Paul uses a principio argument with regard to faith vs. works as the means to achieve salvation:

What then shall we say was gained by Abraham, our forefather according to the flesh? For if Abraham was justified by works, he has something to boast about, but not before God. For what does the Scripture say? “Abraham believed God, and it was counted to him as righteousness.” Now to the one who works, his wages are not counted as a gift but as his due. And to the one who does not work but believes in him who justifies the ungodly, his faith is counted as righteousness, just as David also speaks of the blessing of the one to whom God counts righteousness apart from works:

                 “Blessed are those whose lawless deeds are forgiven,
                                and whose sins are covered;
                 blessed is the man against whom the Lord will not count his sin.” (Romans 4:1-8 ESV)

In order to understand this passage we must assume like Paul a broad perspective and narrow scope.

First, it’s broad perspective can be explained in terms of salvation history, that is, the movement of God away from Judaism, a parochial and traditional religion, to Gentile Christianity with it universal appeal.  Those that resisted change have been called the circumcision party or Judaizing teachers.  They were also called dogs!  But in his polemical argument against the Jews, Paul focused on receiving circumcision as the symbol of converting to Judaism.  Therefore, in the immediate context of his principio argument above we find the following verses:
 
Is this blessing then only for the circumcised, or also for the uncircumcised? For we say that faith was counted to Abraham as righteousness. How then was it counted to him? Was it before or after he had been circumcised? It was not after, but before he was circumcised.  He received the sign of circumcision as a seal of the righteousness that he had by faith while he was still uncircumcised. The purpose was to make him the father of all who believe without being circumcised, so that righteousness would be counted to them as well, and to make him the father of the circumcised who are not merely circumcised but who also walk in the footsteps of the faith that our father Abraham had before he was circumcised.  (Romans 4:9-12 ESV) 

This passage also determines, second, the narrow scope of his principio argument, which is the question of whether the new Gentile believers should follow the law.  In other words, should they become Jews?  Paul’s answer is simple.  Abraham was not circumcised when he was chosen.  He received circumcision, the work at issue, only after he believed and was reckoned as righteous.  In this way Abraham became an example, as Paul said, the father of all that experience God as he did: sequentially to trust and obey.

Now, in order rightly to apply this “no works” principio argument in preaching and teaching we must exercise intellectual discipline.  It is a logical fallacy to apply a polemical argument about salvation history to the personal discipleship of an individual Christian.  Paul used the example of Abraham to make an argument that justifies admission of believing Gentiles as a class in the unfolding historical plan of God.  But it would be wrong to take that argument and apply it in reverse order to individual people.  Paul said, for instance, stepping back from his argument with the Judaizers: 

For in Christ Jesus neither circumcision nor uncircumcision counts for anything, but only faith working through love.  (Galatians 5:6 ESV) 

So, Paul envisions on the personal level a faith that works.  Likewise, he is not against the moral law but sees it as essential to salvation for the individual: 

He will render to *each one* according to his works: to those who by patience in well-doing seek for glory and honor and immortality, he will give eternal life … For it is not the hearers of the law who are righteous before God, but the *doers of the law who will be justified* … For God has done what the law, weakened by the flesh, could not do. By sending his own Son in the likeness of sinful flesh and for sin, he condemned sin in the flesh, in order that the *righteous requirement of the law might be fulfilled* in us, who walk not according to the flesh but according to the Spirit.  (Romans 2:6-7, 13, and 8:3-4 ESV, emphasis mine) 

One might be tempted to say, in light of the immediately argument above, that pneumatology replaces legalism or works righteousness in Christianity.  But “legalism” often gets a bad rap!   “Works righteousness” is a canard used by anti-Catholics that do not understand the broad perspective and narrow scope of the no works principle in Paul.  In truth there is nothing in the New Testament to say that an individual Christian ought not to work, pursue righteousness, or obey God’s holy word.  In fact, obedience is required and conditions met in order to receive the Spirit: 

Now when they heard this they were cut to the heart, and said to Peter and the rest of the apostles, “Brothers, what shall we do?”  And Peter said to them, “Repent and be baptized every one of you in the name of Jesus Christ for the forgiveness of your sins, and you will receive the gift of the Holy Spirit. (Acts 2:37-38 ESV) 

And we are witnesses to these things, and so is the Holy Spirit, whom God has given to those who obey him.”  (Acts 5:32 ESV) 

The "no works" principle then applies only to arguing for the independence of Gentile Christianity in the broad perspective, admitting that Gentiles had not been in covenant previously and could not point to any works of the law that qualifies us.  Gentile Christians are justified by the Faith “apart from” works of the law (Judaism) as a mere function of historic reality.  God forgives us Gentiles for past sins (Romans 3:25) and invites us to enter covenant relationship through the blood of Jesus.

Sunday, January 27, 2013

More on NT Wright


Thoughts in Response to NT Wright's
4QMMT and Paul: Justification, ‘Works,’ and Eschatology
Wright is, as are most of us evangelical-types, entirely too bound to the Calvinist-Reformed doctrine of SOLA FIDE.  It clouds nearly everything that we do, say, think, or feel.  We exhibit all the qualities of being brainwashed by nearly 500 years of anti-Catholic rhetoric and propaganda.  It blinds us to a true grammatical-historical assessment of the New Testament record.  To counter that pervasive bias I want to make several observations, couched in terms of what Wright has written about 4QMMT.
First, in 14 sources of Pauline thought (13 undisputed letters and Acts) there are only 4 that deal briefly with justification by faith … and those have fallen victim to poor translation, bad exegesis, and over-use.
Second, Paul never wrote, to our knowledge, the words “faith alone.”  They cannot be found in the Pauline letters that we have.  The one place they occur in Scripture says, “A man is justified by works and not by faith alone.”  Would the Holy Spirit inspire diametrically opposed views?
Third, his “deep Jewishness,” as Wright spoke of it, would have never allowed Paul to preach an anti-nomian message.
Fourth, I mostly agree with Wright’s excellent analysis that the Qumran document provides the Jewish covenantal/eschatological sectarian framework for understanding “justification by faith” in Paul.   But I do not agree that it substitutes belief for an appropriate halakhah.  I contend that the “justification by faith” formula of “reckoned as righteous” was early thinking in a pre-70 historical context and eventually disappeared when Judaism lost credibility due to events.  The absence of “justification by faith” in so many of his letters reflects a diminishing threat post-70.  “Faith reckoned,” does not represent systematic and mature thought but a reaction to Judaizing teachers accompanied by calling them dogs and wishing they would cut off the whole of their genitalia!  His loftiest and most affectionate thought is contained in letters from Rome after the Jewish threat was resolved by Titus in fulfillment of prophecy, to which I Thessalonians 2:16 alludes, for instance, which is probably of a later date than popularly assumed.  But while Pharisaic and sectarian forms of Judaism remained viable a Q4MMT-type argument of “reckoned righteousness” within a Jewish context would have had great polemical power for Paul.  His Jewish opponents would have known exactly what he meant.  But previously I said that I “mostly” agree with this analysis.  There is no doubt that Paul’s use of Abraham believing the word of God and thereby being deemed as “righteous” has historical parallel to his own experience of many Gentile converts entering covenant relationship in their initial response to the Gospel.  He was a missionary on the front lines of new spiritual territory.
Fifth and finally, how might belief in the Resurrection provide reckoned righteousness when there is no mention of it in Paul’s most extensive discussion in I Corinthians 15?  Wright observes no textual link with the moral code (despite Romans 8:4).  It would seem that what’s good for the goose is good for the gander.  But what might resolve the issue?  Two thoughts:
1.       Paul’s insistence on his own apostolic authority does the opposite of what Wright claims.  He rules in several cases of church discipline, instructs successors and emissaries, and writes many ethical passages asserting the rule of a distinctly Christian halakhah in the world.  In that way he is remarkable for the lack of any significant departure from Jewish moralism given his necessarily independent nature, philosophical leanings, and suffering at the hands of the Jews.  In Paul’s personal knowledge of the apostolic tradition (spending two weeks with Peter, attending the Jerusalem Council, and no doubt knowing what Luke had researched) he was thoroughly informed of the Christian moral code handed down by Jesus himself.  He may well have seen the gospels of Matthew, which contains the Sermon on the Mount.  He likewise followed the hermeneutical method of Hellenistic rabbis, Jesus, and the apostles: converting Jewish legal and cultic tradition into universal categories provided by Greek cosmic, moral, and philosophical dualism, especially in references to carnal vs. spiritual living, which is much more prominent in his work than justification by belief.  In Galatians, for instance, the so-called Magna Charta of Christian Liberty, he syncretizes the flesh vs. Spirit principle with arête behavioral lists made famous in Greek moral philosophy.  Walking uprightly in the Spirit (holiness theology) forms the new “righteousness from God,” or the uniquely Christian halakhah that justifies Gentiles to whom he is sent as the chief apostle, identifying them as part of the new man that God has created in Christ Jesus for good works that we should walk in them.

2.       The so-called “doctrinal chapters” of Romans, Galatians, Ephesians, and Philippians, in which Paul presents  justification by the Faith for Gentile converts, are followed by a corollary, introduced by therefore.  The implication of moral code, exhortation to good works, discipline, warning, encouragement, and behavioral expectation follows the story as night follows day.
In the end I agree with Wright that trusting Jesus points to the covenant community preparing for the end of the world.  Faith is indeed evidence of grace justifying the believing Gentiles as citizens of heaven.  But I do not agree that faith alone is its mark.  An expanded definition of what it means to believe would rightly include characteristic works of the Christian.  This view makes better use of the Q4MMT document than Wright employed.

Saturday, January 5, 2013

Thoughts on Salvation by Faith by John Wesley


(PRINTED IN THE YEAR 1779.)

1. IT is now upwards of forty years since my brother and I were convinced of that important truth, which is the foundation of all real religion, that “by grace we are saved through faith.” And as soon as we believed, we spoke; when we saw it ourselves, we immediately began declaring it to others. And, indeed, we could hardly speak of anything else, either in public or private. It shone upon our minds with so strong a light, that it was our constant theme. It was our daily subject, both in verse and prose; and we vehemently defended it against all mankind.

2. But in doing this we met with abundance of difficulty; we were assaulted and abused on every side. We were everywhere represented as mad dogs, and treated accordingly. We were stoned in the streets, and several times narrowly escaped with our lives. In sermons, newspapers, and pamphlets of all kinds, we were painted as unheard-of monsters. But this moved us not; we went on, by the help of God, testifying salvation by faith both to small and great, and not counting our lives dear unto ourselves, so we might finish our course with joy.

3. While we were thus employed, another storm arose from a quarter whence we least expected it. Some of our familiar friends declared open war against us for preaching salvation by works! This we could not in anywise understand; we wondered what they meant. We utterly disavowed the charge; we denied it in the strongest terms. We declared, over and over, both in public and private, “We believe, and constantly preach, salvation by faith. Salvation by works is a doctrine we abhor; we neither preach nor believe it.” But it did not avail: Say what we would, the same charge was still repeated; and that not only when we were at a convenient distance, but even before our face.

4. At first we were inclined to think, that many who affirmed this, did not believe themselves; that it was merely a copy of their countenance, spoken ad movendam invidiam. And could we have been fully persuaded of this, the difficulty would have been solved. But we did not dare to give way to the thought: Whatever they might think or say of us, we could not but think they were upright men, and spoke according to their real sentiments. The wonder therefore remained, how they could impute to us a doctrine which our soul abhorred, and which we were continually opposing, and confuting with all our might.

5. I was in this perplexity when a thought shot across my mind, which solved the matter at once: “This is the key. Those that hold, ‘Everyone is absolutely predestinated either to salvation or damnation,’ see no medium between salvation by works and salvation by absolute decrees.” It follows, that whosoever denies salvation by absolute decrees, in so doing (according to their apprehension) asserts salvation by works.

6. And herein I verily believe they are right. As averse as I once was to the thought, upon further consideration, I allow there is, there can be, no medium. Either salvation is by absolute decree, or it is (in a scriptural sense) by works. Yea, this I will proclaim on the housetop, - there is no medium between these. You must either assert unconditional decrees, or (in a sound sense) salvation by works.

7. This deserves a fuller examination: Let us consider it more attentively. If the salvation of every man that ever was, is, or shall be, finally saved, depends wholly and solely upon an absolute, irresistible, unchangeable decree of God, without any regard either to faith or works foreseen, then it is not, in any sense, by works. But neither is it by faith: For unconditional decree excludes faith as well as works; since, if it is either by faith or works foreseen, it is not by unconditional decree. Therefore, salvation by absolute decree excludes both one and the other; and, consequently, upon this supposition, salvation is neither by faith nor by works.

8. If, on the other hand, we deny all absolute decrees, and admit only the conditional one, (the same which our blessed Lord hath revealed,) “He that believeth shall be saved;” we must, according to their apprehension, assert salvation by works. We must do this, (in a sound sense of the expression,) if we believe the Bible. For seeing no faith avails, but that “which worketh by love,” which produces both inward and outward good works, to affirm, No man is finally saved without this, is, in effect, to affirm, No man is finally saved without works. It is plain, then, if we affirm, No man is saved by an absolute, unconditional decree, but; only by a conditional one; we must expect, all who hold unconditional decrees will say, we teach salvation by works.

9. Let none, therefore, who hold universal redemption be surprised at being charged with this. Let us deny it no more; let us frankly and fairly meet those who advance it upon their own ground. If they charge you with holding salvation by works, answer plainly, “In your sense, I do; for I deny that our final salvation depends upon any absolute, unconditional decree. If, therefore, there be no medium, I do hold salvation by works. But observe: In allowing this, I allow no more than that I am no Calvinist. So that, by my making you this concession, you gain - just nothing.”

10. I am therefore still consistent with myself, as well as consistent with the Bible. I still hold, (as I have done above these forty years,) that “by grace we are saved through faith;” yet so as not to contradict that other expression of the same Apostle, “Without holiness no man shall see the Lord.” Meantime, those who maintain absolute predestination, who hold decrees that have no condition at all, cannot be consistent with themselves, unless they deny salvation by faith, as well as salvation by works. For, if only “he that believeth shall be saved,” then is faith a condition of salvation; and God hath decreed, from all eternity, that it should be such. But if the decree admit of any condition, it is not an unconditional decree. Either, therefore, you must renounce your unconditional decrees, or deny that faith is the condition of salvation; or (which is just the same thing) affirm, that a man may be saved without either faith or works.

11. And I am consistent with myself; as well as with the Bible, when I affirm, that none shall be finally saved by any “faith” but that “which worketh by love,” both inward and outward holiness. I fear, many of them that hold unconditional decrees are not sensible of this. For they seriously believe themselves to be in the high road to salvation, though they are far from inward (if not outward) holiness. They have not “put on humbleness of mind, bowels of mercy, brotherly-kindness.” They have no gentleness, no meekness, no long-suffering; so far are they from the “love that endureth all things.” They are under the power of sin; of evil-surmising; of anger; yea, of outward sin. For they scruple not to say to their brother, “Thou fool!” They not only, on a slight provocation, make no scruple of rendering evil for evil, of returning railing for railing; but they bring railing accusations unprovoked; they pour out floods of the lowest, basest invectives. And yet they are within the decree! I instance in the two late publications of Mr. Rowland Hill. “O,” says Mr. Hill, “but Mr. Wesley is a wicked man.” What then? Is he more wicked than him that disputed with Michael about the body of Moses? How, then, durst he bring a railing accusation against a man, when an archangel durst not bring one against the devil? O fight, fight for an unconditional decree! For if there be any condition, how can you be saved?

Monday, December 24, 2012

Critique of NT Wright


I have posted below some characteristic quotes by NT Wright, former Bishop of Durham in the Church of England, and chair of New Testament and Early Christianity at the School of Divinity, St. Andrews. Wright taught Biblical studies at Cambridge, McGill, and Oxford Universities.  He is a popular author and speaker but does not understand the Gospel as he should.

In an interview in Christianity Today in 2007, for instance, Wright said, "Because the great emphasis in the New Testament is that the gospel is not how to escape the world; the gospel is that the crucified and risen Jesus is the Lord of the world. And that his death and Resurrection transform the world, and that transformation can happen to you. You, in turn, can be part of the transforming work. That draws together what we traditionally called evangelism, bringing people to the point where they come to know God in Christ for themselves, with working for God’s kingdom on earth as it is in heaven. That has always been at the heart of the Lord’s Prayer, and how we’ve managed for years to say the Lord’s Prayer without realizing that Jesus really meant it is very curious."

Of course, escape is a completely valid way to conceive of the Gospel message.  It is the very word used on numerous occasions in the literature:

You serpents, you brood of vipers, how are you to escape being sentenced to hell? (Matthew 23:33 ESV)

But stay awake at all times, praying that you may have strength to escape all these things that are going to take place, and to stand before the Son of Man.” (Luke 21:36 ESV)

Do you suppose, O man—you who judge those who practice such things and yet do them yourself—that you will escape the judgment of God? (Romans 2:3 ESV)

No temptation has overtaken you that is not common to man. God is faithful, and he will not let you be tempted beyond your ability, but with the temptation he will also provide the way of escape, that you may be able to endure it. (I Corinthians 10:13 ESV)

While people are saying, “There is peace and security,” then sudden destruction will come upon them as labor pains come upon a pregnant woman, and they will not escape. (I Thessalonians 5:3)

[T]hey may come to their senses and escape from the snare of the devil, after being captured by him to do his will. (II Timothy 2:26 ESV)

[H]ow shall we escape if we neglect such a great salvation? It was declared at first by the Lord, and it was attested to us by those who heard, (Hebrews 2:3 ESV)

See that you do not refuse him who is speaking. For if they did not escape when they refused him who warned them on earth, much less will we escape if we reject him who warns from heaven. (Hebrews 12:25 ESV)

The most powerful of human instincts, which all living beings possess, is to survive.  All living things have some form of intelligence that serves that desire.  But human beings, made in the image and likeness of God, are also spiritual beings; therefore, we utilize rational self-interest at cosmic and complex levels to seek our eternal welfare. That kind of thinking is called in the Greek phronesis; it is a learned behavior and required to understand Scripture.  The beatitude of Scripture is that God wants us to maximize our chances of happiness, which ultimately means to live forever with him, which is the first duty of man.  Therefore, God communicates to us the facts as he sees them, calling us to “flee the wrath to come.” (Luke 3:7 and I Thessalonians 1:10)

What must we do to escape?  The first word of the Kerygma (proclamation of the Gospel) is repentance, the reason being the immanent destruction of the world and all the sinners in it, which, according to Biblical prophecy is an essential prerequisite for the coming kingdom.  When we pray for the kingdom to come on Earth as it is in Heaven we are asking for the end of this world and the dawn of the age to come.  Therefore, to enter the kingdom we are called to escape judgment, the sin that causes it to fall upon us, and finally, the proximate causes of sin, namely: the world, the flesh, and the devil.  That’s why the Lord’s Prayer asks that we not be led into temptation but delivered from evil.

A faithful exposition of the New Testament would address these root causes of sin – first, the world, because confusion about the world hinders truly effective Christian ministry and discipleship.  Repentance with regard to the world is detachment (see I Corinthians 7:31 below).

The Christ event is meant to transform us individually, who, like Jesus and in following him, die to the world as the world dies to us (Galatians 6:14) by the renewal not of the social environment but of our own way of thinking about things (Romans 12:1-3).  There is no prospect of our transforming the world because that is not God’s plan.  God’s plan is to destroy this world in favor of a new one, populated by a new kind of humanity, which he is now preparing through Christ, who will return to execute the judgments of God and complete the salvation of his people.  This lack of an apocalyptic vision is the chief weakness of Wright’s thought.  So, let us review what Scripture actually says about the nature and subsequent fate of world as we know it.

This is what I mean, brothers: the appointed time has grown very short. From now on, let those who have wives live as though they had none, and those who mourn as though they were not mourning, and those who rejoice as though they were not rejoicing, and those who buy as though they had no goods, and those who deal with the world as though they had no dealings with it. For the present form of this world is passing away. (1 Corinthians 7:29-31 ESV)

In their case the god of this world has blinded the minds of the unbelievers, to keep them from seeing the light of the gospel of the glory of Christ, who is the image of God. (II Corinthians 4:4 ESV)

But far be it from me to boast except in the cross of our Lord Jesus Christ, by which the world has been crucified to me, and I to the world. (Galatians 6:14 ESV)

And you were dead in the trespasses and sins  in which you once walked, following the course of this world, following the prince of the power of the air, the spirit that is now at work in the sons of disobedience— (Ephesians 2:1-2 ESV)

If with Christ you died to the elemental spirits of the world, why, as if you were still alive in the world, do you submit to regulations— (Colossians 2:20 ESV)

The saying is trustworthy and deserving of full acceptance, that Christ Jesus came into the world to save sinner, of whom I am the foremost. (I Timothy 1:15 ESV)
 
For Demas, in love with this present world, has deserted me and gone to Thessalonica. Crescens has gone to Galatia, Titus to Dalmatia. (II Timothy 4:10 ESV)

In these passages it seems that Paul has no interest in “making the world a better place.”  He conceives of Jesus saving sinners and folding us into a Church.  In the Greek “church” is ekklesia, referring those “called out” of the world.  But what might others say?  Is the Church an ark of salvation, for instance?  It appears so.

By faith Noah, being warned by God concerning events as yet unseen, in reverent fear constructed an ark for the saving of his household. By this he condemned the world and became an heir of the righteousness that comes by faith. (Hebrews 11:7 ESV)

Some were tortured, refusing to accept release, so that they might rise again to a better life. Others suffered mocking and flogging, and even chains and imprisonment. They were stoned, they were sawn in two, they were killed with the sword. They went about in skins of sheep and goats, destitute, afflicted, mistreated—of whom the world was not worthy—wandering about in deserts and mountains, and in dens and caves of the earth. (Hebrews 11:35-38 ESV)

You adulterous people! Do you not know that friendship with the world is enmity with God? Therefore whoever wishes to be a friend of the world makes himself an enemy of God. (James 4:4 ESV)
 
For if God did not spare angels when they sinned, but cast them into hell and committed them to chains of gloomy darkness to be kept until the judgment; if he did not spare the ancient world, but preserved Noah, a herald of righteousness, with seven others, when he brought a flood upon the world of the ungodly … For if, after they have escaped the defilements of the world through the knowledge of our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ, they are again entangled in them and overcome, the last state has become worse for them than the first. (II Peter 2:4-5 & 20 ESV)

For they deliberately overlook this fact, that the heavens existed long ago, and the earth was formed out of water and through water by the word of God, and that by means of these the world that then existed was deluged with water and perished. But by the same word the heavens and earth that now exist are stored up for fire, being kept until the day of judgment and destruction of the ungodly. (II Peter 3:5-7 ESV)

Do not love the world or the things in the world. If anyone loves the world, the love of the Father is not in him. For all that is in the world—the desires of the flesh and the desires of the eyes and pride of life—is not from the Father but is from the world. And the world is passing away along with its desires, but whoever does the will of God abides forever. (I John 2:15-17 ESV)

See what kind of love the Father has given to us, that we should be called children of God; and so we are. The reason why the world does not know us is that it did not know him. (I John 3:1 ESV)

Do not be surprised, brothers, that the world hates you. (I John 3:13 ESV)

Beloved, do not believe every spirit, but test the spirits to see whether they are from God, for many false prophets have gone out into the world. By this you know the Spirit of God: every spirit that confesses that Jesus Christ has come in the flesh is from God, and every spirit that does not confess Jesus is not from God. This is the spirit of the antichrist, which you heard was coming and now is in the world already. Little children, you are from God and have overcome them, for he who is in you is greater than he who is in the world. They are from the world; therefore they speak from the world, and the world listens to them. We are from God. Whoever knows God listens to us; whoever is not from God does not listen to us. By this we know the Spirit of truth and the spirit of error. (1 John 4:1-6 ESV)

For everyone who has been born of God overcomes the world. And this is the victory that has overcome the world—our faith. Who is it that overcomes the world except the one who believes that Jesus is the Son of God? (I John 5:4-5 ESV)

We know that we are from God, and the whole world lies in the power of the evil one. (I John 5:19 ESV)

For many deceivers have gone out into the world, those who do not confess the coming of Jesus Christ in the flesh. Such a one is the deceiver and the antichrist.  (II John 1:7 ESV)

That’s enough, or should be enough, to show that the world is beyond hope, doomed, in the power of evil, and that we should not waste our time trying to make it a better place.  Rather, we ought to do as Jesus did, who came to seek and save lost souls, yes, to escape the world, its temptations and entanglements.

In the Challenge of Jesus: Rediscovering … Wright says, “Our task as image-bearing, God-loving, Christ-shaped, Spirit-filled Christians, following Christ and shaping our world, is to announce redemption to a world that has discovered its fallenness, to announce healing to a world that has discovered its brokenness, to proclaim love and trust to a world that knows only exploitation, fear and suspicion…”

I suppose that if the world ever “discovered its fallenness” there might be hope of love and trust but that is not the Gospel analysis as the passages above indicate with undeniable clarity.  One might forgive an individual that is merely naïve about the nature of the world and its future.  But in the quote to follow we see an agenda.  In Surprised by Hope Wright says, "Hope is what you get when you suddenly realize that a different worldview is possible, a worldview in which the rich, the powerful, and the unscrupulous do not after all have the last word. The same worldview shift that is demanded by the resurrection of Jesus is the shift that will enable us to transform the world.”

I am always suspicious of those that demonize the rich/powerful and link those persons with “unscrupulous” behavior … and then want to “transform the world” … all in one sentence!  I suppose it’s because the carnal poor and the carnal rich look the same to me.  But carnal vs. spiritual is not the primary distinction in the Marxist religion as it is in Christianity.  Christian cosmic and moral dualism is the shift that the death and resurrection of Jesus inspire, not transforming the world.

How might we explain Wright’s error?  I think that the bishop represents a kind-of cultural Christianity that fails fully to embrace the future judgment of God upon the world.  He serves in an official national Church and may be deceived by the historic sanction of European monarchs, Constantine, Theodosius, and Henry VIII, to name the succession.  Calling that kind of political entanglement “a transformation of the world” is highly questionable from a historic perspective.  While the advancement of Western culture was facilitated by the Church and, conversely, the Church provided its major themes and motifs, it is difficult to ignore abuses such as suppression of the Donatists, the Crusades, Inquisition, Indulgences, and the crimes of Conquistadors in the New World.  The Christianization of Roman law and administration counts as wisdom in most cases but it hardly satisfy the Biblical injunction to make disciples of all nations.  In fact the geo-political definition of “nations,” as Wright well knows, is not the New Testament teaching at all.  In Biblical parlance “nations” simply means all kinds of non-Jewish folk.  At one point the Jews themselves became just another “nation” that needed conversion (Acts 4:23-31).

But again, whereas traditional Western society has its problems, new Left Wing political regimes, aided and abetted by the Higher Critical Method in Biblical studies, are in no way a manifestation of Christian morals but are a positive evil in the world, which will suffer the wrath of God for their atheistic murderous thefts and revolutionary outrages against the demonized “rich.”

What we must realize is that Wright not only represents a national Church but a liberal one.  All of Western Europe and the mainline denominations of America have embraced the Social Gospel with its Marxist analysis, defining the kingdom of God in socio-economic terms.  Scripture says, though, “The kingdom of God is not meat and drink but righteousness, peace, and joy in the Holy Spirit.”  (Romans 14:17)  Jesus told Pilate that the kingdom was “not of this world.”  (John 18:36)  Jesus never uttered a word about social justice.  His ethical admonitions, from the Golden Rule to the Sermon on the Mount to the Great Commission to the Law of Love, are a personal and ecclesiastical rule.  Standing before Herod, Jesus might have harangued him about social justice but said not a word, indicating no respect whatsoever for a man that murdered his cousin.  That is what the world always does; and so, we might get a clue – this world is not a nice place and according to Christian prophecy never will be.

I understand the temptation to shoe-horn Jesus into the prevailing ethos of a particular Church group.  But when that group is fundamentally flawed, as is the Church of England and others to which I’ve alluded, one must take a prophetic posture, not necessarily an academic one.  A prophetic posture is not possible unless one understands the eternal divine consequences of bad doctrine and morals.

In Surprised by Hope, Wright misses that mark entirely, saying, “All Christian language about the future is a set of signposts pointing into a mist.”
No, the signposts accurately describe what will happen and several things are quite clear, taken at face value.  Jesus says, for instance that the Gospel must first be preached to all nations (understood as above as all kinds of people) then the end will come (Matthew 24:14).  He also says that there will be astronomical and meteorological events that serve as signs.  He never says anything about the nation-state of Israel but puts forth the rough outline of Christian prophecy in terms of our being both persecuted and effective in spreading his word (Mark 13:11).  The hope he gives is that we will be raised from the dead as he was (I Corinthians 15).  But if some of us are alive at his coming there will be a rapture, as it has been called.  The rapture is not the prelude to a new dispensation, though.  It is merely a practical answer to what happens to us when Christ returns if we are not yet dead and buried:
But we do not want you to be uninformed, brothers, about those who are asleep, that you may not grieve as others do who have no hope. For since we believe that Jesus died and rose again, even so, through Jesus, God will bring with him those who have fallen asleep. For this we declare to you by a word from the Lord, that we who are alive, who are left until the coming of the Lord, will not precede those who have fallen asleep. For the Lord himself will descend from heaven with a cry of command, with the voice of an archangel, and with the sound of the trumpet of God. And the dead in Christ will rise first. Then we who are alive, who are left, will be caught up together with them in the clouds to meet the Lord in the air, and so we will always be with the Lord. Therefore encourage one another with these words. (1 Thessalonians 4:13-18 ESV)
Finally, there is the fearful prospect of judgment by fire.  We know, of course, that Scripture uses fire metaphorically with two meanings: purification and judgment.  But let us suppose for an instant that some references to fire in the New Testament, especially in Christian prophecy, are meant literally.  With the proliferation of nuclear weapons and missile technology the metaphors morph into credible threats to human existence.  The only thing required to set it off is a complete moral and diplomatic breakdown among nations.  Similarly, one needs only to look at the Moon to see the effects of near Earth asteroids.  We know that some have hit the Earth before.  What happened to the dinosaurs could happen to us!  Additionally, helio astronomers tell us that a massive solar flare could annihilate planet Earth.  Catastrophism is a valid interpretive principle when considering Christian end time predictions.  I will close with three of them:
“And there will be signs in sun and moon and stars, and on the earth distress of nations in perplexity because of the roaring of the sea and the waves, people fainting with fear and with foreboding of what is coming on the world. For the powers of the heavens will be shaken. And then they will see the Son of Man coming in a cloud with power and great glory. Now when these things begin to take place, straighten up and raise your heads, because your redemption is drawing near.” (Luke 21:25-28 ESV)
This is evidence of the righteous judgment of God, that you may be considered worthy of the kingdom of God, for which you are also suffering—since indeed God considers it just to repay with affliction those who afflict you, and to grant relief to you who are afflicted as well as to us, when the Lord Jesus is revealed from heaven with his mighty angels in flaming fire, inflicting vengeance on those who do not know God and on those who do not obey the gospel of our Lord Jesus. They will suffer the punishment of eternal destruction, away from the presence of the Lord and from the glory of his might, when he comes on that day to be glorified in his saints, and to be marveled at among all who have believed, because our testimony to you was believed. To this end we always pray for you, that our God may make you worthy of his calling and may fulfill every resolve for good and every work of faith by his power, so that the name of our Lord Jesus may be glorified in you, and you in him, according to the grace of our God and the Lord Jesus Christ. (2 Thessalonians 1:5-12 ESV)
They will say, “Where is the promise of his coming? For ever since the fathers fell asleep, all things are continuing as they were from the beginning of creation.” For they deliberately overlook this fact, that the heavens existed long ago, and the earth was formed out of water and through water by the word of God, and that by means of these the world that then existed was deluged with water and perished. But by the same word the heavens and earth that now exist are stored up for fire, being kept until the day of judgment and destruction of the ungodly.
But do not overlook this one fact, beloved, that with the Lord one day is as a thousand years, and a thousand years as one day. The Lord is not slow to fulfill his promise as some count slowness, but is patient toward you, not wishing that any should perish, but that all should reach repentance. But the day of the Lord will come like a thief, and then the heavens will pass away with a roar, and the heavenly bodies will be burned up and dissolved, and the earth and the works that are done on it will be exposed.
Since all these things are thus to be dissolved, what sort of people ought you to be in lives of holiness and godliness, waiting for and hastening the coming of the day of God, because of which the heavens will be set on fire and dissolved, and the heavenly bodies will melt as they burn! But according to his promise we are waiting for new heavens and a new earth in which righteousness dwells. (2 Peter 3:4-13 ESV)